Close search
Popular searches
Paris, 6 October 2014
Compensation of François Enaud, Chief Executive Officer of Sopra Steria Group
As part of the tie-up between Sopra and Steria, François Enaud, General Manager of Groupe Steria SCA, was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Sopra Steria Group on 3 September 2014. At the current time François Enaud receives no compensation for his role as Chief Executive Officer of Sopra Steria Group.
A General Meeting of Groupe Steria SCA shareholders will be held on 16 October 2014 to vote on the conversion of Groupe Steria SCA into a société anonyme (French limited-liability company). Depending on the decision of Groupe Steria SCA’s shareholders, François Enaud will step down as General Manager of that company.
At the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and after deliberation, the Board of Directors of Sopra Steria Group decided, at a meeting on 6 October 2014, to attribute as from the date of Group Steria SCA’s conversion into a société anonyme the following elements of compensation to François Enaud, Chief Executive Officer of Sopra Steria Group:
The Board of Directors decided furthermore to allot François Enaud, until the end of the 2014 financial year, a compensation package in the event of severance identical to that which he currently has as General Manager of Groupe Steria SCA.
The terms of payment of the severance compensation are as follows:
Severance compensation would be due in the event of non-voluntary departure (removal from or non-renewal of the Chief Executive Officer position) or resignation consequent to a change of control, except in cases of gross or wilful misconduct. Severance compensation would not be due in the event of voluntary retirement or resignation not consequent to a change of control.
The amount of severance compensation would be calculated based on the following three performance criteria applied over the entire time for which the position of General Manager of Groupe Steria was held. As the executive term of office of the General Manager began in 1997, the benchmarks to be used in computing the performance criteria are those of the 1997 financial year, the point at which the benchmark period starts.
Criterion No. 1: growth:
The Group’s revenue growth must be greater than the average revenue growth of IT services companies in Europe (benchmarking by Gartner or another industry analysis provider) over the benchmark period;
Criterion No. 2: operating margin:
The increase in the average operating margin (average of the last three years to date) must be at least 5% per annum, on average, over the benchmark period;
Criterion No. 3: current fully diluted EPS:
The increase in current fully diluted EPS (average of the last three years to date) must be more than 10% per annum, on average, over the reference period.
Assuming performance conditions are met, the severance compensation paid cannot exceed two years of the Chief Executive Officer’s gross fixed and variable compensation. The amount of one “year of compensation” would be determined on the basis of (i) annual fixed compensation for the year in which severance occurs and (ii) the average of the last two annual variable compensation amounts paid prior to the severance date.
If severance occurs consequent to a change of control of the Company, and except in cases of gross or wilful misconduct, the amount of severance compensation cannot be less than that of one year of compensation, irrespective of the satisfaction of performance criteria, in consideration notably of François Enaud’s length of service at the Company.
This commitment conforms to AFEP/MEDEF recommendations, with the following two exceptions: